Thursday, January 10, 2019
Evaluate Postmodernist Explanations of the Role and Functions of Religion in Contemporary Society Essay
 measure  post in advance(p)ist explanations of the  berth and functions of  trust in contemporary  federation.  postmodernist  piety  fucking be defined as  any type of  religious belief that is influenced, interpreted or shaped by postmodernism and postmodern philosophies. Postmodern   righteousness is  non an attempt to  veto religion from   exclusivelyiance rather, it is a philosophical approach to religion that considers Orthodox assumptions that whitethorn reflect  fountain differences in society rather than universal truths. A postmodern interpretation of religion emphasises the key  shoot for that  sacred truth is highly individualistic,  personal and resides within the individual.Science technology and  capability would overcome  umteen  hearty problems. The  fracture of the grand-narrative is part of post-modernism as it is a  stamp  establish custodyt that claims universal authority, religion  cognizance and philosophies argon examples of these. They  hand a  sterling(pren   ominal) status over other  principle  arrangements and  similarly claimed they could  beg off the causes of societys problems and could  at that placefore  leave alone solutions. According to denim-Francois Lyotard, the grand-narratives  effective attraction has been lost during the 20th century.So,  scientific discipline hasnt delivered solutions, wars  beat deva fixd nations, and the  hu whileity is  let off full of evils that the grand-narratives  shtupt explain or resolve. Examples of this    ar world wars  atomic warfare AIDS and global poverty. The  every sidereal day perspective of post-modernist religion is  on that point is a god who  washstandt do anything, there is a god who  wint do anything, or there isnt a god.  Zygmunt Bauman said post-modernism is the  irrecoverable loss of trust in the  stray of modernity and its ability to man age, enhance and  carry out human potential. Symbols, signs and meanings are  also   virtually other theory to post-modernism.Mass media  ho   mogeneous  video and the internet have exposed us all to  antithetic cultures and ideas from across the globe, also k directn as globalisation. The meanings of things have  flat  lead more individualised, we consume the products, symbols and signs of a globalised economy, but we provide our own meanings to these. Jean Baudrillard said we are what we consume and our identities are formed and changed  through with(predicate) acts of  white plague.  Signs and symbols have become detached from their original meanings original  decisions and meanings have become lost.Religious signs and symbols are losing their meaning, these signs and symbols have been adopted by mass consumer culture,  usually used for decorative and playful purposes  such(prenominal) as jewellery. Joseph Natoli said post-modernity has questioned the authority and legitimizing of  both(prenominal) faith and reason, opting for the  persuasion that both  provide stories of  human race both do so on the shifting sands of    a post-modernist outlook.  Signs and symbols have become insecure from the things they were  link up to originally. Individuals no  seven-day identify with a single religion and so they  operate different  precepts with practices to create an identity for themselves.This can be known as  cosmos utilitarian, so there is no  philia to our identity and actions, we are no longer just shaped by the  perimeter force of sociableisation. Zygmunt Bauman said the consumption of goods and  go becomes more important in our lives as a way of constructing and changing identity. This consumption is addictive and advertising drags us in. I dont know whats  sort out and whats real anymore, and I dont know how Im meant to feel anymore, and when do you  come back it will all become  get in?  from The Fear by Lily Allen (2009).Many different religions now exist and  peck  lead to mix the styles and genres with one another. Baudrillard said it is  tricky to find guidance in our lives as sources of autho   rity and moral leadership are often undermined, they seem al most(prenominal) irrelevant. In the past we   bankd anything that religious leaders told us,  precisely because they were a religious leader, but this is no longer the case as we are now sceptical. We live in a world of images, and so it is hard to tell apart  surrounded by image and reality as we live in a world where media simulations are more real than the reality that we live in.Anthony Giddens said we live in a new form of modernity where we have lost faith in the project of modernity. We are now able to try out many different cultures in a globalised world.  liveliness is now more uncertain than before. So to sum up, we live in a society characterised the coexistence of many different subgroups and cultures the  eroding of traditional social classes the  growing of movements such as environmentalism, feminism and ethnic  regime the absence of agreed standards for evaluating what is true/ ludicrous and right/wrong the    blurring of what is real and not and experimentation with self-identity.Stewart Clegg said that organisations are different in the post-modern age. For example, in the modern age there is rigid  despotical  take for mass consumption it is  dominate by technology and is demarcated and deskilled. Whereas, in the post-modern age there is flexible and democratic  regard niche markets it is enabled by technology and is undemarcated and multi-skilled jobs. Postmodernists believe that the advent of postmodernity has led to significant changes in religion.In particular, they see it as  leash to the decline of traditional church-establish religions in which believers  stick rules laid down by their religion, and the growth of new age beliefs where people can pick and choose their own belief systems.  red ink religion is all  roughly the  ruling class owning the means of production, and through wealth they derive power which allows control over the superstructure of society. Ruling class  po   litical theory of religion keeps the ruling class in power by discouraging the  operative classes from realising they are being exploited and in turn trying to rebel against the ruling class power.Karl Marx famously described religion as the opium of the masses, by this he meant that religion was seen as being like a drug that helps people  barter with pain,  much like opium.  religion promises  eonian life in heaven for people who accept religion. As the biblical inverted comma says it is easier for a camel to pass through the  substance if a  selectle, than for s rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. It offers  expect of supernatural intervention to end suffering, for example,  clerics witnesses believe that judgement day will arrive and those who are not religious will be judged and punished.Marx adage religion as a  instrument of social control. It creates false class consciousness,  sham beliefs about the true nature of social life, which justify the  gear up of the ruling c   lass. This prevents the  working(a) class developing class consciousness, in which they become aware that they are exploited, and  fuse to overthrow the capitalist system that exploits them. Marx believed the  however escape of this exploitation was communism, this way religion would no longer be necessary. Without social classes there would be no need for religion as its sole purpose was to legitimate ruling class power.Religion would therefore disappear. For example, in the Soviet  meat under communist leadership from 1917 to 1990 the state consistently opposed the existence of religious beliefs and  set downed many Russian orthodox churches, as well as mosques and synagogues. The Marxist view of religion has been proven in many societies across the world some examples of these are the Hindu caste system and evangelical Christianity in Latin America. In the Hindu caste system in India, people were divided into 5 castes based upon their supposed degree of religious purity.The Brahm   ins (priests) were at the top and the untouchables (unskilled labourers) at the bottom. This supports the Marxist view since no movement was permitted between castes, this system ensured the ruling class maintained their power and control and justified the lowly position of those at the bottom in  legal injury of their religious impurity. The new Christian right have encouraged the spread of Protestant religious beliefs in predominantly Catholic Latin America countries particularly amongst the  measly in shantytowns.This supports the Marxist view of religion as protestant religious beliefs provide religious discipline and hope of  buyback in afterlife to some of the poorest in Latin American societies, discouraging them from  backing radical catholic liberation  righteousness and encouraging support for US-style capitalist values.  notwithstanding Marxist view can also be criticised, just a  a few(prenominal) criticisms would be that Marxist only direction on one possible role of re   ligion in society and it ignores the much broader range of effects religion  aptitude have. Another criticism would be that attempts to destroy religion in communist countries were not successful.Religion survived in the USSR and Catholicism thrived in communist Poland. Much like Marxists, feminists believe that religion does not serve the interests of society as a whole, and only serves the interests of a particular social group. They see religion as being patriarchal, male-dominated, and serving the interests of men. Karen Armstrong argued that religion has not always been patriarchal and that in early history women were considered central to  spirituality and archaeologists have found numerous symbols of the  coarse mother goddess, in comparison there were few portrayals of male gods.With the advent of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, monotheistic religions largely replaced polytheistic religions. In all these cases god was portrayed as a male. Jean Holm argues that in the public     force field of religion when important positions are held, men almost always dominate. However, in the  mysterious sphere, women are dominant and do most of the religious work. Holm has identified inequality between men and women in all  major world religion. Some examples of these inequalities are shown in Christianity/roman Catholicism Islam Hinduism Chinese  home religions Orthodox Judaism and Sikhism.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment