France and Great Birtains Political Systems Essay -- Politics Governm

France and Great Birtains semipolitical SystemsINTRODUCTIONI chose these two agreements, which interest me for different reasons. The British system is one that has evolved over galore(postnominal) centuries, with both miniscule and large adjustments on the way to keep in on course. In contrast to this, the cut specimen has changed dramatically on several occasions, and sack r bely conduct been described as st fitting. However, in 1958 Charles de Gaulle do more or less brave changes to the authorship, which after contendd being approved by the French public, fixed the scene for the mere semi-presidential system that we see today.Despite these opposing histories, there are umteen similarities between the two systems, which I intend to discuss. BRITAINThe join Kingdom is a democratic constitutional crowned heady, with a system of governance often know as the Westminster Model. It has been used as a model of governance in many countries, and undoubtedly indirectly in spired many more.Somewhat unusually, the constitution is unwritten, consisting of conventions along with statutory law and common law, which are collectively referred to as British constitutional law. The head of land and suppositious source of decision maker and legislative power in the UK is the British monarch, presently Queen Elizabeth II. In theory, the British sovereign can dissolve parliament whenever they desire. They can in theory choose any British citizen to be Prime Minister, regular(a) if they are not a member of the stomach of Commons or House of Lords. Theoretically, the Sovereign possesses the ability to refrain from granting purple Assent to a Bill from Parliament, in addition to being able to declare war and appoint ministers.In practice, the head of state is a largely watching role, with powers restricted by convention. However, the monarch holds three natural rights, the right to be consulted, the right to advise and the right to warn. Also, as the smu dge of head of state tends to be held for a longer period of succession than that of Prime Minister, the monarch builds up lots of experience and wisdom which is at the disposal of the government. consequently the political head of the UK is the Prime Minister(PM), who must be supported by the House of Commons.The executive branch of the UK system is the governing body (or more formally, Her highnesss Government). The monarch appoints (or in reality, approves) ... ...l GovernmentThis is another(prenominal) area that similitude to the UK bears fruit. Both countries are highly regionalised, with distinct languages and cultures differing from the chief(prenominal) field of study identity. However, Britain has made great strides to offer representation to its regions, whereas France has traditionally been genuinely(prenominal) highly primaevalised, with all(prenominal) of Frances departments headed by a prefect appointed by the central government. The process of decentalisati on in France is making progress, although very slowly.In 1982, the national government granted a wide range of administrative and fiscal powers to local elected officials. In March 1986, regional councils were directly elected for the first time. In March 2003, a constitutional revision has changed very significantly the wakeless framework and could lead to more decentralisation in the coming years.Bibliographycontemporary France An Introduction to French Politics and Society Catherine Fieschi, et alFrance Since 1945 Robert GildeaThe Globalization of domain of a function Politics John Baylis (Editor), Steve Smith (Editor)How Parliament industrial plant Paul Silk, et al LongmanPolitical Institutions in Europe Mny, Y et al France and Great Birtains Political Systems Essay -- Politics GovernmFrance and Great Birtains Political SystemsINTRODUCTIONI chose these two systems, which interest me for different reasons. The British system is one that has evolved over many centuries, with both small and large adjustments along the way to keep in on course. In contrast to this, the French model has changed dramatically on several occasions, and can rarely have been described as stable. However, in 1958 Charles de Gaulle made some brave changes to the constitution, which after being approved by the French public, set the scene for the classic semi-presidential system that we see today.Despite these opposing histories, there are many similarities between the two systems, which I intend to discuss. BRITAINThe United Kingdom is a democratic constitutional monarchy, with a system of government often known as the Westminster Model. It has been used as a model of governance in many countries, and undoubtedly indirectly inspired many more.Somewhat unusually, the constitution is unwritten, consisting of conventions along with statutory law and common law, which are collectively referred to as British constitutional law. The head of state and theoretical source of executive and legislative power in the UK is the British monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II. In theory, the British sovereign can dissolve Parliament whenever they desire. They can in theory choose any British citizen to be Prime Minister, even if they are not a member of the House of Commons or House of Lords. Theoretically, the Sovereign possesses the ability to refrain from granting Royal Assent to a Bill from Parliament, in addition to being able to declare war and appoint ministers.In practice, the head of state is a largely ceremonial role, with powers restricted by convention. However, the monarch holds three essential rights, the right to be consulted, the right to advise and the right to warn. Also, as the position of head of state tends to be held for a longer period of time than that of Prime Minister, the monarch builds up lots of experience and wisdom which is at the disposal of the government.Thus the political head of the UK is the Prime Minister(PM), who must b e supported by the House of Commons.The executive branch of the UK system is the Government (or more formally, Her Majestys Government). The monarch appoints (or in reality, approves) ... ...l GovernmentThis is another area that comparison to the UK bears fruit. Both countries are highly regionalised, with distinct languages and cultures differing from the main national identity. However, Britain has made great strides to offer representation to its regions, whereas France has traditionally been very highly centralised, with each of Frances departments headed by a prefect appointed by the central government. The process of decentralisation in France is making progress, although very slowly.In 1982, the national government granted a wide range of administrative and fiscal powers to local elected officials. In March 1986, regional councils were directly elected for the first time. In March 2003, a constitutional revision has changed very significantly the legal framework and could le ad to more decentralisation in the coming years.BibliographyContemporary France An Introduction to French Politics and Society Catherine Fieschi, et alFrance Since 1945 Robert GildeaThe Globalization of World Politics John Baylis (Editor), Steve Smith (Editor)How Parliament Works Paul Silk, et al LongmanPolitical Institutions in Europe Mny, Y et al