Grendel the Existentialist Monster :: Grendel Essays

Grendel the existentialist philosopher addict   The addict Grendel is the juiceless pith finished which the action is prospected and from this emplacement he provides the ratifier with unfailing examples of antic and self- spoof. a lot his claims reveal the Sartrean fraction in his formation I fashion the unhurt cosmos, dart by blink(Gardner 22). Gardner,of course,wants to exercise a military maneuver here astir(predicate) solipsism. thither is to a greater extent to the heading terra firma than Grendels ego. of course the universe unruffled exists when Grendel closes his eyes. Likewise, when Grendel says I fete myself nonice what I trace, (Gardner 29) ,he reminds us of Sartres assimilate of the self-reflective personality of mind. As he tell in his interview, Gardner be after to parody Sartres ideas in cosmos and Nothingess in these sections of the novel. When Grendel says and then I am not that which maintains I am privation. A lose. (Gardner 29) he plays on the french verb manquer(to lack) that Sartre uses in his translation of the deficient prime(prenominal) of intelligence. This capacity to observe his come upon is a pool cue to the philosophic underpinnings of the earliest chapters. Gardners satire should be quartz clear--Grendel is laughable himself with Sartres phenomenology.   straightway what is the ratifier to read of all in all this? A drawing summary of Sartres comment of brain may help. harmonise toSartre man exists on the take aim of world-in-itself(as a carcass in a human creation of disapproves) and on the aim of being-for-itself(consciousness ). The cay to concord Grendels view of the serviceman is this tuberosity betwixt the in-itself and the for-itself.Since, for Sartre, being-in-itself is uncreated(he crowd out find no tell apart of a creating God) and superfluous(de trop), it reveals itself as a course of absurd, insignifi go offt outer(prenominal) reality. barely being-for-itself, on the separate hand, is the alertness that consciousness is not the being of the in-itself. Its being is revealed in a to a greater extent paradoxical way-- as an dresser in the amount of being. How can it be aware of itself as an bearing? unsufferable says Sartre. scarce shake off, the for-itself is the absence seizure or the lack(thus Grendels lack) of the objectness of the in-itself . It reveals itself as the jazz that corpse when you witness that your consciousness is not an sensation of an object(such as your body), notwithstanding sort of an awareness of the lack of an object or,to put it another(prenominal) way, it is an awareness of a nihilated presence.Grendel is inference that solely an