Voluntary Abortion or Compulsory Sterilization? :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Voluntary Abortion or irresponsible Sterilization? Starting in the mid-1960s, some erosion of the anti-miscarriage laws began to take place. still these efforts have not been supported by many of the more birdsong groups who are trying to do something about excess population fruit to them, compulsory birth control and compulsory sterilization are patently more palatable than voluntary stillbirth. The result is legal chaos--which has been the situation with name to abortion since it was first do illegal in this country. Contrary to habitual belief, the legal strictures against abortion are of comparatively recent origin. Until the early ordinal century--at common law twain in England and in the United States--abortion before quickening was not illegal at all(a). It became so only in the early 1800s. And according to Professor Cyril Means and others who have studied the problem, the undercoat for the enactment of the laws was not protection of morals or of the soul of the fetus, only if rather a reflection of the fact that at the time all surgical procedures were highly risky because of the probability of infection (this was before Lister). Abortions were made illegal for this reason except where they were necessary to save the life of the give that is, where the great risk of infection which every operation involved was outweighed by the risk of carrying that particular pregnancy to term. The situation is today reversed abortion under modern hospital conditions is safer than childbirth. Nor is there any evidence that abortion involves psychological health hazards. A poll of the American Psychiatric companionship in the mid-1960s revealed overwhelming support for more easily available abortions and a conviction that adverse psychological sequelae from abortion are negligible both on an absolute standard and as compared with such sequelae from childbirth and abdicable children. Though the population experts have not yet aligned themselves on the side of abortion-law reform, something is beginning to happen. Seven states--Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, New Mexico, and North Carolina--have amended their laws to sanction abortion not only to save life but besides to protect the health, mental and physical, of the mother, in cases of rape and incest, and to avert the birth of forged offspring (Governor Reagan forced the omission of this ground in the California law). umteen other states have been and are now considering abortion reform or repeal bills but usually without the support of the powerful groups who are clientele other forms of population control.